Chaeson R. Sears v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHAESOM R. SEARS, Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-0409 TLN AC PS v. ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC, et al., ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Chaeson R. Sears (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 25, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (ECF No. 34.) Plaintiff timely filed objections. (ECF No. 35.) In opposition, Plaintiff argues the Court should decline to adopt the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and unjust enrichment claims, or in the alternative, grant with leave to amend. (Id. at 1.) As for his TILA’s claim, Plaintiff contends he can clarify that he never received written notice identifying the new…