Chaeson R. Sears v. Rocket Mortgage, LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20252:25-cv-00409California537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHAESOM R. SEARS, Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-0409 TLN AC PS v. ROCKET MORTGAGE, LLC, et al., ORDER Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Chaeson R. Sears (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding in this action in pro per. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 25, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one (21) days. (ECF No. 34.) Plaintiff timely filed objections. (ECF No. 35.) In opposition, Plaintiff argues the Court should decline to adopt the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) and unjust enrichment claims, or in the alternative, grant with leave to amend. (Id. at 1.) As for his TILA’s claim, Plaintiff contends he can clarify that he never received written notice identifying the new…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.