Macomber

Darryl Burghardt v. Kelly Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20252:25-cv-00960California650 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 DARRYL BURGHARDT, No. 2:25-cv-0960-SCR Petitioner, v. ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING KELLY SANTORO, Respondent.1 17 Petitioner is an incarcerated person representing himself in this habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Currently pending before the court is respondent’s motion to dismiss the habeas petition on the basis that it is barred by the statute of limitations. ECF No. 9. Having reviewed the state lodged documents which demonstrate various periods of time when petitioner was mentally incompetent, the court finds it appropriate to order supplemental briefing to further develop the record in this case. See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1229-30 (9th Cir. 2013) (recognizing that equitable tolling involves a fact-intensive inquiry). Specifically, the parties are directed to address the following issues: 1) whether petitioner

Respondent requests that Kelly Santoro be substituted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.