Schultz

Javier Miranda v. Jason Schultz, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20252:25-cv-01345California3,652 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAVIER MIRANDA, No. 2:25-cv-1345 CSK P Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. JASON SCHULTZ, et al., Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the court will direct

On July 15, 2025, plaintiff filed an interlocutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.