Karan Tandon v. Coinbase, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20252:25-cv-02111California849 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARAN TANDON, Case No. 2:25-cv-02111-DJC-CSK PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN

COINBASE, INC., et al., FORMA PAUPERIS Defendants. (ECF No. 2) 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Karan Tandon’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis.1 (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff proceeds without counsel in this action. Plaintiff has initiated this action with a civil complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1, 2.) For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends DENYING Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. I. LEGAL STANDARDS In order to commence a civil action, along with the complaint, a plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and the $55.00 administrative fee or file an application requesting leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). The court may authorize the commencement of an action “without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.