Woodson

Jeremiah Michael Castillo v. April Woodson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20252:25-cv-02116California2,941 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMIAH MICHAEL CASTILLO, Case No. 2:25-cv-02116-DAD-CSK PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS APRIL WOODSON, (ECF Nos. 1, 2) Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Jeremiah Michael Castillo is representing himself in this action and seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.1 (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends Plaintiff’s IFP application be denied, and the Complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. I. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) provides that the court may authorize the commencement, prosecution or defense of any suit without prepayment of fees or security “by a person who submits an affidavit stating the person is “unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.” This affidavit is to include, among other things, a statement of all assets the person possesses. Id. The IFP statute does not itself define what…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.