Navarro

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ZOOX, INC., Case No. 25-cv-03596-RFL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

VERONICA NAVARRO, Re: Dkt. No. 77 Defendant.

Zoox moves to dismiss this action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). (See Dkt. No. 77 (the “Motion”).) Navarro filed an opposition. (See Dkt. No. 80.) The Motion is taken under submission as suitable for resolution without oral argument and is GRANTED. See Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). “A Rule 41(a)(2) motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the district court . . . .” Sams v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 625 F.2d 273, 277 (9th Cir. 1980) (citations omitted). “A district court should grant a motion for voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) unless a defendant can show that it will suffer some plain legal prejudice as a result.” Smith v. Lenches, 263 F.3d 972, 975 (9th Cir. 2001) (citations and footnote omitted). “Legal prejudice is a term of art: it means prejudice to some legal interest, some legal claim, some legal argument. But [u]ncertainty because a dispute remains…