Khoo

Dana Gray v. A. Khoo, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20251:20-cv-01047California836 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANA GRAY, No. 1:20-cv-01047-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. Doc. 159 A. KHOO, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Dana Gray is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 11, 2022, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, Doc. 105, and on October 11, 2022, defendants opposed plaintiff’s motion and filed a motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff’s claims, Docs. 125, 126. On June 23, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment be denied and defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. Doc. 159. Specifically, the magistrate judge found that plaintiff had failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact and 26 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.