Campbell

Charles A. Rogers v. K. Campbell, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20251:21-cv-00021California516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES A. ROGERS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00021 JLT SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT IN PART

v. AND DENY IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

K. CAMPBELL, et al., (Doc. 34) Defendants. 16 17 Charles A. Rogers seeks to hold Defendants liable for violations of his civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The magistrate judge recommended Defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. 34.) Specifically, the magistrate judge recommended Defendants’ motion be denied as to the First Amendment retaliation claim concerning Defendant Campbell and granted as to the Fourteenth Amendment due process claims against Defendants Cates and Sullivan. (Id. at 7-16.) The magistrate judge advised the parties that the “failure to file objections within the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.