(SS)Cassidy

Janna Lee Cassidy v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20251:24-cv-00922California4,909 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANNA LEE CASSIDY, Case No. 1:24-cv-00922-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY1

v. (Doc. Nos. 12, 14) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Janna Lee Cassidy (“Plaintiff”), seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. (Doc. No. 1). The matter is currently before the undersigned on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted without oral argument. (Doc. Nos. 12, 14). For the reasons set forth more fully below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, denies Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and remands the matter to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings. //// 27 Both parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(1). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.