Gray
Richard Gray v. Fresno Police Department
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD GRAY, Case No. 1:25-cv-00410 JLT HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT
v. (Doc. 12) FRESNO POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. 16 Richard Gray, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this action by filing a civil complaint against Fresno Police Department on April 9, 2025. (Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge conducted a preliminary review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), and found Plaintiff failed to set forth a basis for jurisdiction and failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. 6 at 1, 6-7.) The court granted Plaintiff leave to amend his complaint. Id. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint on June 16, 2025. (Doc. 7.) The magistrate judge screened the FAC and on July 23, 2025, issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that the FAC be dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to allege federal question jurisdiction. (Doc. 9 at 4-5.) The Court notified…