Jones
Joseph Bonderer v. Gena Jones
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH BONDERER, No. 2:20-cv-00415 DC-AC (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
GENA JONES, (Doc. Nos. 35, 40) Respondent. 16 Petitioner Joseph Bonderer, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his petition, Petitioner first claims that his Due Process rights were violated by the “wrongful admission of an unfairly suggestive and unreliable single photo identification of him by [the victim] which tainted her in court identification of him . . .” (Doc. No. 1 at 32.) Petitioner also claims the warrantless seizure of his DNA following his arrest was in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.1 (Id. at 40.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 9, 2024, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the…