Jamisi Jermaine Calloway v. Naphcare Incorporated, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20252:24-cv-02446California539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMISI JERMAINE CALLOWAY, No. 2:24-cv-2446 DJC CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS NAPHCARE INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil action. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s amended complaint is before the court for screening. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). Plaintiff’s amended complaint is essentially the same as the original…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.