Singh

Jonathan Christopher Coffer v. Singh, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20252:24-cv-03247California383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER COFFER, No. 2:24-cv-3247 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SINGH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 9, 2025, the court recommended that plaintiff’s second amended complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that this case be closed. Plaintiff has filed objections to the court’s September 9, 2025, findings and recommendations. In light of the objections, the court’s September 9, 2025, findings and recommendations will be vacated, and plaintiff will be granted leave to file a third amended complaint. As to the contents of the third amended complaint, plaintiff should refer to the court’s February 26 and March 18 orders, as well as the September 9 findings and recommendations. Plaintiff is reminded that Local Rule 220 requires that an amended complaint be complete in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.