Chalal

Maninder Chalal v. United Financial Casualty Company and Does 1–50

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20252:25-cv-00037California4,408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MANINDER CHALAL, individually,

Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-00037-TLN-SCR v. UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY ORDER COMPANY, and DOES 1–50, 14 Defendants.

16 This matter is before the Court on Defendant United Financial Casualty Company’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff Maninder Chalal (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 8.) Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 9.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The instant action arises out of Defendant’s alleged lack of timeliness in tendering payment under an insurance policy. (ECF No. 1-1.) On January 22, 2022,1 Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract with Defendant which provided coverage for bodily injury claims. (Id. at 5.) On April 5, 2022, Plaintiff suffered injuries in a car accident. (Id.) On June 2, 2023, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.