Soraya Maria Rigor v. Sacramento Regional Transit, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SORAYA MARIA RIGOR, No. 2:25-cv-00243-TLN-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Soraya Maria Rigor (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se in this matter, which was referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On August 27, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations, but did file a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (ECF No. 7) during the 14-day period for objections. The Court will construe the FAC as an objection. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully…