Iskander
Milad Iskander v. Protective Life Insurance Co.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MILAD ISKANDER, No. 2:25-cv-1150-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE CO., Defendant. 16 This action for breach of contract and other claims was originally filed in the Solano Superior Court and removed to federal court on April 18, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) It proceeds on the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed May 15, 2025. (ECF No. 12.) The parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction for all purposes, including final entry of judgment. (ECF No. 11.) Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the FAC under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff has filed an opposition (ECF No. 14), and defendant has filed a reply (ECF No. 15). On July 9, 2025, the motion was taken under submission without appearance and argument. (ECF No. 16.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion to dismiss in part and deny it in part. /// /// 28 …