Madsen

Rafael Martirosyan v. Madsen, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20251:24-cv-01168California1,589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAFAEL MARTIROSYAN, Case No. 1:24-cv-01168-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

v. COURT ORDER AND FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

MADSEN, et al., (ECF No. 25) Defendants.

16 I. Background Plaintiff Rafael Martirosyan (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on October 2, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On January 17, 2025, prior to screening of the complaint, Plaintiff filed a supplemental complaint (docketed as a first amended complaint), which included new defendants not named in the original complaint and did not include any of the original defendants. (ECF No. 11.) On June 16, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice of intent, which the Court subsequently construed as a motion to file an amended complaint and motion to stay the case. (ECF No. 16.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.