Brooke

Theresa Brooke v. Mehta N. Bharat, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20251:25-cv-01145California353 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THERESA BROOKE, Case No. 1:25-cv-01145 JLT CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DECLINING

v. SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER

PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW CLAIM

MEHTA N. BHARAT, et al., (Doc. 6) Defendants.

Theresa Brooke seeks to hold Mehta N. Bharat and Nita Bharat liable for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act. (Doc. 1.) Following an order to show cause regarding jurisdiction (Doc. 4), the assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations, recommending the Court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claim and dismiss the Unruh Act claim without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(4). (Doc. 6.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff1 and informed her that any objections must be filed within 14 days of the date of service. (Doc. 6 at 8.) The Court 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.