Mossinger

Joshua Davis Bland v. Jon Mossinger, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20252:20-cv-00051California1,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, No. 2:20-cv-00051-DAD-SCR (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

JON MOSSINGER, et al., MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND

AGAIN DENYING DEFENDANTS’

Defendants. MOTION TO DISMISS THIS ACTION AS

HECK BARRED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

16 (Doc. No. 65) 17 On February 25, 2025, the court adopted the assigned magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations and denied defendants’ request to dismiss plaintiff’s remaining claims as barred under the decision in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). (Doc. No. 64.) Defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of that order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) and Local Rule 230(j). (Doc. No. 65.) Local Rule 230(j) requires that a motion for reconsideration state “what new or different facts or circumstances are claimed to exist which did not exist or were not shown upon such prior motion, or what other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.