Carl Ackerman v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20252:24-cv-01992California630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL ACKERMAN, No. 2:24-cv-01992-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Withdraw filed by Alex Farzan and The Law Office of Alex Farzan, counsel for Plaintiff Carl Ackerman (“Plaintiff”). (ECF No. 15.) Defendants filed a statement of non-opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. The Local Rules of this district require an attorney who would withdraw and leave his or her client without representation to obtain leave of court upon a noticed motion. E.D. Cal. L.R. 182(d). Local Rule 182(d) also requires an attorney to provide notice to the client and all other parties who have appeared, and an affidavit stating the current or last known address of the client. Id. Finally, to comply with Local Rule 182(d), the attorney must conform to the requirements of the California Rules of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.