Ronald Dixon v. Commissioner of Social Security

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RONALD DIXON, Case No. 2:24-cv-03252-TLN-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

14 Defendant.

16 On August 27, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF No. 16), which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 16). No objections were filed and the time to do so has passed. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007). In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations…