Raheem Jones, et al. v. City of Sacramento Board of Supervisors, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAHEEM JONES, et al., Case No. 2:25-cv-0864-DJC-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CITY OF SACRAMENTO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On August 25, 2025, defendant City of Sacramento filed a motion to dismiss this case for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 26. To date, plaintiffs have not responded to defendant’s motion. Under the court’s local rules, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to a motion no later than fourteen days after the date it was filed. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c). To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir.…