Latoya R. Finley-Carminer v. Sacramento County Sheriff, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20252:25-cv-02789California739 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LATOYA R. FINLEY-CARMINER, No. 2:25-cv-2789 DAD CSK P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Petitioner has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Petitioner challenges a pending arrest warrant issued in Sacramento County, California, alleging that there is no probable cause to support the arrest warrant. Petitioner claims she faces imminent unlawful detention and requests emergency relief. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) Therefore, the Court construes the instant petition as being filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The exhaustion of state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.