Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. Westlake Financial Services, Inc., et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS Case No. 1:25-cv-00957-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v.
FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
12 WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., (ECF No. 11) et al.,
14 Defendant.
16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 8.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint which was lodged on September 18, 2025. (ECF No. 10.) Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, leave to amend shall be freely given when justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). “In the absence of . . . undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc.—the leave sought…