Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. Westlake Financial Services, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20251:25-cv-00957California501 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS Case No. 1:25-cv-00957-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT

AND DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v.

FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

12 WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., (ECF No. 11) et al.,

14 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF Nos. 1, 8.) Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint which was lodged on September 18, 2025. (ECF No. 10.) Under Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, leave to amend shall be freely given when justice so requires. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). “In the absence of . . . undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc.—the leave sought…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.