State of California v. Phillip Del Rosa et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20252:23-cv-00743California2,594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 State of California, No. 2:23-cv-00743-KJM-SCR Plaintiff, ORDER Vv. ye Phillip Del Rosa et al., 1S Defendants. 16 After holding defendant Darren Rose in contempt for violations of the preliminary 18 injunction in this action and anticipating the potential for future noncompliance, the court 19 previously provided for prospective and conditional sanctions. See generally Prev. Order 20 (Feb. 28, 2024), ECF No. 71; Prospective Sanctions Order (Nov. 18, 2024), ECF No. 95. The court ordered the following: Any future noncompliance with the preliminary injunction or the nonmonetary sanctions [provided by this order] will result in the following further sanctions: $10,000 for the first day of noncompliance, $12,000 for the second day of noncompliance, $14,000 for the third day of noncompliance, $16,000 for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.