Cueva

Paul David Carr v. Daniel E. Cueva, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20252:24-cv-01680California4,348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL DAVID CARR, No. 2:24-cv-01680 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

DANIEL E. CUEVA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner who filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without a lawyer. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before the court is plaintiff’s third motion for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order and for ruling on the motion. ECF Nos. 35, 39. For the reasons stated below, the court grants the motion for ruling and recommends the motion for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order be denied. I. Background Plaintiff has filed three motions for preliminary injunctive relief in this case. ECF No. 6, 21, 35. The first was denied because plaintiff’s complaint did not state cognizable claims against the person it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.