Mark Baker v. Zipline International Inc., et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK BAKER, No. 2:25-cv-01063-DC-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS ZIPLINE INTERNATIONAL INC., et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff filed a pro se civil complaint and this matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The undersigned issued findings and recommendations on June 26, 2025 (ECF No. 30), recommending that plaintiff’s motion to remand (ECF No. 14) be denied, defendants Yolo Land & Cattle Co. and Zipline International Co.’s motion to dismiss be granted (ECF No. 21), and defendant Yolo County’s motion to dismiss be granted (ECF No. 22). The undersigned allowed plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the issuance of an order adopting the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 30 at 16.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint in accordance with the order would result in a recommendation that the action be…