Oreglia

Christopher Brian Oreglia, et al. v. County of Placer, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20252:25-cv-00959California430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER BRIAN OREGLIA, et al., No. 2:25–cv–00959-CKD Plaintiffs, ORDER v. COUNTY OF PLACER, et al., Defendants. 16 On September 2, 2025, plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 6) along with a request for dismissal of defendants Hahn, Miller, and Solverson. (ECF No. 7.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A) provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment . . . .” “Under Rule 41(a)(1), a plaintiff has an absolute right voluntarily to dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment. Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1). The dismissal is effective on filing and no court order is required...Unless otherwise…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.