Crites-Bachert
Crites-Bachert v. Providence Health & Services - Oregon
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 10 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MELANIE CRITES-BACHERT, No. 24-6664 D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 3:23-cv-01510-YY v.
MEMORANDUM*
PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES -
OREGON,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 6, 2025**
Before: M. SMITH, NGUYEN, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Melanie Crites-Bachert appeals from the district court’s dismissal of
her complaint alleging that Defendant Providence Health & Services - Oregon
(“Providence”) violated her rights by implementing state and federal regulations
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). requiring healthcare personnel to receive COVID-19 vaccinations. With
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…