Rojas-Espinoza
Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 202524-7536California238 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
FILED
NOV 10 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536
ESPINOZA; ROBERT DAVID
SALVADOR-GOMEZ; DAVID ANGEL Agency Nos.
SALVADOR-ROJAS; KORINA A246-606-483
SALVADOR-ROJAS, A246-606-482
A246-606-484
Petitioners, A246-606-485
v.
ORDER
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
BEFORE: S. R. THOMAS, Circuit Judge and En Banc Coordinator
A judge of this Court has sua sponte requested a vote on whether the Order
issued by the three judge panel on October 24, 2025 and this case should be
reheard en banc pursuant to General Order 5.4.c.3. To facilitate the en banc
process, the three judge panel has consented to stay the Order issued on October
24, 2025. Therefore, the October 24, 2025 Order issued by the three judge panel is
stayed pending the conclusion of en banc proceedings and further order of this
Court.
The parties are permitted, but not required, to file simultaneous
supplemental briefs addressing whether this…