Rojas-Espinoza

Rojas-Espinoza v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 10, 202524-7536California238 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

FILED

NOV 10 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARICRUZ MARISOL ROJAS- No. 24-7536

ESPINOZA; ROBERT DAVID

SALVADOR-GOMEZ; DAVID ANGEL Agency Nos.

SALVADOR-ROJAS; KORINA A246-606-483

SALVADOR-ROJAS, A246-606-482

A246-606-484

Petitioners, A246-606-485

v.

ORDER

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

BEFORE: S. R. THOMAS, Circuit Judge and En Banc Coordinator

A judge of this Court has sua sponte requested a vote on whether the Order

issued by the three judge panel on October 24, 2025 and this case should be

reheard en banc pursuant to General Order 5.4.c.3. To facilitate the en banc

process, the three judge panel has consented to stay the Order issued on October

24, 2025. Therefore, the October 24, 2025 Order issued by the three judge panel is

stayed pending the conclusion of en banc proceedings and further order of this

Court.

The parties are permitted, but not required, to file simultaneous

supplemental briefs addressing whether this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.