Corbett
Montiqueno Corbett and Rob Dobbs, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Pharmacare U.S., Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MONTIQUENO CORBETT and ROB Case No.: 3:21-cv-00137-JES-AHG DOBBS, individually and on behalf of all 12 others similarly situated, AMENDED ORDER AWARDING BILL OF COSTS TO DEFENDANT Plaintiffs, 14 v. [ECF No. 282]
PHARMACARE U.S., INC.,
16 Defendant. 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Retax Costs. ECF No. 282. Defendants filed an opposition. ECF No. 283. Plaintiffs filed a reply. ECF No. 284. On September 24, 2025, the Court held oral arguments and took the matter under submission. ECF No. 290. Plaintiffs argue that costs should be allocated between this matter and the related case Sunderland v. PharmaCare U.S., Inc., No. 3:23-cv-01318-JES-AHG (“Sunderland”). Plaintiffs’ argument is partially premised on an agreement by the parties submitted to the Court on May 20, 2024, in which the parties agreed that certain depositions in this matter could be used in the Sunderland case,…