Berland

Leslie Berland v. X Corp., Successor in Interest to Twitter, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20253:24-cv-07589California1,292 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LESLIE BERLAND, Case No. 24-cv-07589-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR CHUMAN

v. CERTIFICATION

X CORP., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO Re: Dkt. No. 81 TWITTER, INC., et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Defendants have appealed the Court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiff’s state law claims. (Dkt. Nos. 69, 75.) Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an order certifying Defendants’ interlocutory appeal is frivolous or waived and retaining jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims pursuant to Chuman v. Wright, 960 F.2d 104 (9th Cir. 1992). (Dkt. No. 81.) Having carefully considered the parties’ submissions, the Court concludes oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), VACATES the November 20, 2025 hearing, and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion. Plaintiff has not met the high bar of showing Defendants’ appeal is frivolous or waived to warrant issuing a Chuman certification and proceeding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.