Eric Hinders v. Warden B. Birkholz

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20252:25-cv-07446California606 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 2:25-cv-07446-SVW-AJR Date: November 10, 2025 Page 1 of

Title: Eric Hinders v. Warden B. Birkholz

DOCKET ENTRY: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD

NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT

PRESENT:

HONORABLE A. JOEL RICHLIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

_ Claudia Garcia-Marquez _______None_______ __None__ Deputy Clerk Court Reporter/Recorder Tape No.

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PETITIONER: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR RESPONDENT:

None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS)

On August 22, 2025, pro se Petitioner Erik Hinders (“Petitioner), an inmate in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) at FCI Lompoc II, filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (the “Petition”). (Dkt. 1.) In the Petition, Petitioner challenged a prison disciplinary finding that resulted in the loss of good time credits. (Id. at 1.) On November 7, 2025, Respondent filed a Status Report advising that since the filing of the Petition, the BOP has provided Petitioner with a rehearing of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.