Wilkes

Michael Troy Wilkes v. San Mateo County Transit District (SAMTRANS), et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20253:25-cv-06224California2,798 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL TROY WILKES, Case No. 25-cv-06224-TLT

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH

v. PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E)(2) SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (SAMTRANS), et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 17, 19 11 Defendants. 12 13 This is the second time the Court has undertaken the mandatory screening of pro se Plaintiff Michael Troy Wilkes (“Plaintiff”)’s case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Because Plaintiff has failed to cure the deficiencies of his original complaint and establish a case or controversy over which the Court has jurisdiction, the Court must dismiss the action as frivolous. After review of the motions, exhibits, and attachments thereto, the Court screens and DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE. I. BACKGROUND On July 24, 2025, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants SamTrans, Bay Area Rapid Transit, Caltrain, San Mateo Police Department, California Department of Motor Vehicles, San Mateo Superior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.