Presidential Candidate Number P60005535, aka Ronald Satish Emrit v. Erin Burnett, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20253:25-cv-02688California868 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE Case No.: 25-CV-2688 JLS AHG NUMBER P60005535, aka RONALD 12

SATISH EMRIT, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

13 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Plaintiff,

14 v. (ECF No. 2) 15 ERIN BURNETT, et al., 16 Defendants. 17

18 Presently before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit’s Motion to 19 Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“Motion,” ECF No. 2). The Court DENIES Plaintiff’s 20 Motion. 21 IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION 22 All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 23 United States, other than a petition for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $405.1 24 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party’s failure to pay the filing fee 25

26 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative fee of $55. See 27 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.