Singh

Narinder Pal Singh v. Kika Scott, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20251:25-cv-00217California213 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NARINDER PAL SINGH Case No. 1:25-cv-00217-KES-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER RE: NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

KIKA SCOTT, et al. (ECF No. 10) Defendants.

16 17 18 On October 2, 2025, Plaintiff filed a notice stating, “[u]nder Federal Rules of Civil 19 Procedure 41(A), this action is dismissed without prejudice by the Plaintiff in its entirety.” (ECF 20 No. 10, p. 1). The Court notes that no Defendant has yet served either an answer or motion for 21 summary judgment. 22 Accordingly, in light of the voluntary dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), and has been dismissed without prejudice. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate any pending dates and deadlines 2 and to close the case. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED.

5] Dated: _ October 3, 2025 [see hey …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.