Dunlap
Jevarien Z. Dunlap v. Bay Area Rapid Transit
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JEVARIEN Z. DUNLAP,
Case No. 25-cv-08643-JCS Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT,
10 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Jevarien Dunlap, pro se, applied to proceed in forma pauperis and the Court granted his application. Dkt. no. 5. The Court now reviews the sufficiency of Plaintiff’s complaint to determine whether it satisfies 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Because the complaint does not appear to plausibly state a claim, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the complaint should not be dismissed. Plaintiff may file either an amended complaint or a response to this order addressing why his complaint is sufficient, no later than December 10, 2025. The Case Management Conference set for January 7, 2026 is vacated. II. ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT1 Plaintiff has filed a form complaint naming as defendants: 1) Bay Area Rapid Transit; 2) 23 …