Aguiar

Edward McKenna v. C. Aguiar, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20252:25-cv-02009California384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD MCKENNA, No. 2:25-cv-2009 DJC CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER C. AGUIAR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Defendants filed a notice of removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), claiming plaintiff asserted federal claims of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment, in addition to state law claims. (ECF No. 1 at 1-2.) Plaintiff filed a timely motion to remand, accompanied by an amended complaint raising only state law claims. (ECF No. 3.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 2, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party filed objections to the findings and 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.