Romero

Romero v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202524-5814California536 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHANIE ALEXANDRA ROMERO, No. 24-5814 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-01395-AN v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Adrienne C. Nelson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 7, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: M. SMITH, NGUYEN, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Stephanie Alexandra Romero appeals the district court’s order affirming an

Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) denial of her applications for disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Social Security Act. See 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. (Title II); § 1381 et seq. (Title

XVI).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.