Cardenas-Ruiz
Cardenas-Ruiz v. Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANGIE KATHERINE CARDENAS-RUIZ; No. 24-288 A.C., Agency Nos.
A240-291-175
Petitioners, A240-291-174 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted November 7, 2025** Portland, Oregon
Before: M. SMITH, NGUYEN, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Angie Cardenas-Ruiz (“Cardenas-Ruiz”) and her infant daughter
petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming
an order by an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying their applications for asylum,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) protection.