Brokaw

Brokaw v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 12, 202524-6710California953 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 12 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ABIGAIL BROKAW, No. 24-6710 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 6:23-cv-01027-YY v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Youlee Yim You, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 7, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: M. SMITH, NGUYEN, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Abigail Brokaw appeals the district court’s decision affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her applications for disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) must provide “specific,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.