Dijon Bernard v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20252:23-cv-06384California383 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION DIJON BERNARD, ) Case No. 2:23-cv-06384-SB-DTB ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, ) v. ) CONCLUSIONS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
)
METROPOLITAN ) JUDGE
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, ) ) ) Defendant. ) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. …