Dijon Bernard v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20252:23-cv-06384California383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION DIJON BERNARD, ) Case No. 2:23-cv-06384-SB-DTB ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, ) v. ) CONCLUSIONS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF

LOS ANGELES COUNTY ) UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

)

METROPOLITAN ) JUDGE

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, ) ) ) Defendant. ) 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.