In re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20253:25-cv-07066California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on . MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD ANTITRUST

LITIGATION : MDL No. 2406

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —48)

On December 12, 2012, the Panel transferred 2 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 908 F.Supp.2d 1373 (J.P.M.L. 2012). Since that time, 84 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Alabama. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable R. David Proctor. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Alabama and assigned to Judge Proctor. Pursuant □□□ Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure-of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Alabama for the reasons stated in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.