Mariscal

Hector S. Mariscal v. Equifax Information Services LLC, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20253:25-cv-02989California270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 || Hector S. MARISCAL, Case No.: 25-cv-2989-AGS-MMP > Plaintitt, ORDER DISMISSING CASE vs. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES

LLC, et al., Defendants. 10 Self-represented plaintiff Hector Mariscal has neither paid the required filing fees 12 || nor moved to proceed without prepaying them. His case must therefore be dismissed. Parties instituting civil actions in United States district courts must pay $405 in filing 14 |l fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. ID || Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2023). But plaintiffs granted the right to proceed in forma pauperis need not pay those fees. Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Because Mariscal has not paid any filing fees, nor received Court approval not to pay them, his case is DISMSSED without prejudice, and the Clerk must close this case. If 19 |…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.