Urias

Leon Hawkins v. C. Urias

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20251:23-cv-00170California507 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEON HAWKINS, Case No. 1:23-cv-00170-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AS MOOT

v. (Doc. No. 51) C. URIAS,

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Defendant. 16 On August 5, 2025, Plaintiff filed a motion regarding Plaintiff’s settlement payment. (Doc. No. 51). Plaintiff claims that as of the date he signed the motion—July 10, 2025—he had not yet received the settlement funds under the Settlement Agreement which were due on or about July 22, 2025. (Id. at 2). Liberally construed, Plaintiff seeks to enforce the settlement agreement he reached with the California Department of Corrections. On August 22, 2025, Defendant filed an opposition to the motion. (Doc. No. 52). Defendant attaches the Declaration of John W. Nam, Deputy Attorney General. Deputy Attorney General Nam attests that “an update from CDCR’s settlement coordinator” indicates that the “settlement fund payment occurred on August…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.