Doerer
Yuriy V. Vasilchuck v. J. Doerer, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 YURIY V. VASILCHUCK, No. 1:25-cv-00792-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF THE
v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF
J. DOERER, et al., (ECF No. 10) Defendants.
12 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on June 30, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) On July 31, 2025, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the July 31, 2025 order. Therefore, on September 9, 2025, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff has failed to respond…