Steinman

United States v. Steinman

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 202523-1703California13,918 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1703 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:22-cr-00068-

ART-CLB-

v.

TRISTON HARRIS STEINMAN, ORDER AND

AMENDED

Defendant - Appellee. OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Anne R. Traum, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 5, 2024 San Francisco, California

Filed March 5, 2025 Amended November 13, 2025

Before: MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and PATRICK J. BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and GEORGE H. WU, Senior District Judge. *

* The Honorable George H. Wu, United States Senior District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. Order; Amended Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.; Concurrence by Judge George H. Wu

SUMMARY **

Criminal Law

The panel filed (1) an order withdrawing its opinion filed March 5, 2025, and denying as moot a petition for panel or en banc rehearing; and (2) an amended opinion reversing the district court’s order suppressing evidence seized from Triston Harris Steinman’s car following a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.