Utoliti

Utoliti v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 13, 202524-5970California3,817 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

NOV 13 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TUMAINE UTOLITI, Nos. 23-2767 24-5970 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A217-057-349

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued & Submitted October 9, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS, NGUYEN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge BRESS.

Tumaine Utoliti petitions for review of two orders of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”), which have been consolidated for our

consideration. The first petition, No. 23-2767, seeks review of the agency decision

denying petitioner’s application for relief under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. (“CAT”) and related relief. The second petition, No. 24-5970, seeks review of the

BIA’s denial of petitioner’s motion to reopen on grounds of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.