Mitchell v. Chula Vista Parole CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 13, 2025D084234California1,207 words

Opinion

Opinion

Castillo, J.

Filed 11/13/25 Mitchell v. Chula Vista Parole CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

KENYATTA QUINN MITCHELL, D084234

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2020- 00008446-CU-PO-CTL) CHULA VISTA PAROLE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Carolyn M. Caietti, Judge. Affirmed. Kenyatta Quinn Mitchell, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, R. Lawrence Bragg, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Neah Huynh and S. Gray Gilmor, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents. The trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer filed by Defendants Chula Vista Parole, a unit of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.