Gentry

Brandon Gentry v. Manteca Police Department, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20252:22-cv-00720California9,313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRANDON GENTRY, No. 2:22-cv-00720-DC-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MANTECA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR al., IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendants. (Doc. No. 16) 17 This matter is before the court on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, partial summary judgment. (Doc. No. 16.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending motion was taken under submission to be decided on the papers. (Doc. No. 17.) For the reasons explained below, Defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND This civil rights action arises from Plaintiff’s encounter with two local law enforcement officers during a traffic stop, some of which was captured on the officers’ body worn cameras. ///// /////…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.